Raw Foods Diet :: essays research papers

Whats up with the Raw Deal?The Atkins regimen? South-Beach Diet? Jenny Craig? Weight Watchers? But a Raw- victuals only aliment? What the? Consuming only raw foods? Not cooking anything? Isnt that intumescent? Not according to advocates of this forage. The raw foods diet is among some of the latest furor and celebrity-hyped diets out there today, you can even find some restaurants that only serve raw foods. The name of the raw food diet says it both You only consume raw, unprocessed foods. Diet devotees claim the diet improves fodder and wellness, offers spiritual enlightenment and improves digestion among other things. But can a diet consisting only of raw foods truly live up to its promises and can it be healthy? Followers consume a diet regimen do up of fresh, raw harvest-feasts and vegetables, sprouted seeds, nuts, legumes, dried fruits, milk from coconut, fresh fruit and vegetable juices and other organic or natural foods which have not been processed. Sounds healthy. It stems from the thinking that raw and living foods contain the essential enzymes needed for seemly digestion, as well as containing higher nutrient values. Raw food dieters believe the enzymes in raw foods are the life force and that every(prenominal) food has its own essential enzymes. These enzymes help the body digest the foods completely, without relying on the bodys own enzymes. This means that cooked foods, foods cooked higher than 116 F, are bushed(p) because all of these enzymes and nutrients are destroyed. But is their scientific data to back this up? No, not really. It has been coarsely known and accepted that cooking our food is fitter and safer. Cooking foods kills any harmful bacteria, it lets us eat a wide variety of foods especially those who cannot tolerate raw uncooked vegetables, which can abdicate individuals with nutrient deficiencies. And well, yes cooking does kill the foods enzymes, our body has its own enzymes for proper digestion and health and doesnt need other enzymes.